Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re Forfeiture of One 1946 Lockheed, 85-2686 (1986)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 85-2686 Visitors: 5
Judges: Hall
Filed: Jul. 11, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: 493 So. 2d 10 (1986) In re FORFEITURE OF ONE 1946 LOCKHEED L-18 LOADSTAR, RIGHT 1820-A105A ENGINES, VISIBLE ID # N43WT. John S. MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS, Appellee. No. 85-2686. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 11, 1986. Rehearing Denied September 10, 1986. *11 John S. Matthews, Tampa, for appellant. Charles D. Waller, Dade City, for appellee. HALL, Judge. Appellee, City of Zephyrhills, filed suit to forfeit one 1946 Lockheed L-18 Loadstar, Right 1820-
More
493 So. 2d 10 (1986)

In re FORFEITURE OF ONE 1946 LOCKHEED L-18 LOADSTAR, RIGHT 1820-A105A ENGINES, VISIBLE ID # N43WT.
John S. MATTHEWS, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS, Appellee.

No. 85-2686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 1986.
Rehearing Denied September 10, 1986.

*11 John S. Matthews, Tampa, for appellant.

Charles D. Waller, Dade City, for appellee.

HALL, Judge.

Appellee, City of Zephyrhills, filed suit to forfeit one 1946 Lockheed L-18 Loadstar, Right 1820-A105A engines, visible ID # N43WT, which allegedly was used in drug activities. After hearing testimony of the record title owner of the aircraft, appellant, and law enforcement officers involved in investigations concerning the drug activities in which the aircraft was allegedly used, the trial court ordered the aircraft forfeited.

Appellant, John S. Matthews, alleges that ownership of the aircraft was transferred to him by a bill of sale several months prior to the forfeiture action. He contends that he is a bona fide purchaser for value and the record title holder of the aircraft and that the aircraft is not subject to forfeiture under chapter 932, Florida Statutes (1985), since he had no knowledge of the criminal activities in which the aircraft was allegedly used.

We do not agree that appellant is the record title holder of the aircraft. Florida Statutes provide that no instrument which affects the title to an aircraft is valid until such instrument is recorded in the office of the Federal Aviation Administrator. ยง 329.01, Fla. Stat. (1985). Since the bill of sale had not been recorded in the office of the Federal Aviation Administrator of the United States and record title was still in the original owner, appellant is not the owner of the aircraft within the meaning of the forfeiture statute and his interest is not subject to the protection of section 932.703(2), Florida Statutes (1985).

Affirmed.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer