Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JEWELERS INTERN. SHOWCASE, INC. v. Mandell, 88-645 (1988)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 88-645 Visitors: 6
Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt and Baskin
Filed: Aug. 02, 1988
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 529 So. 2d 1211 (1988) JEWELERS INTERNATIONAL SHOWCASE, INC., Petitioner, v. Saul MANDELL, Respondent. No. 88-645. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 2, 1988. Rehearing Denied September 6, 1988. *1212 Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Michael Josephs and Denise V. Powers, Coral Gables, for appellant. Stanley J. Bartel, Miami, for appellee. Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed in p
More
529 So. 2d 1211 (1988)

JEWELERS INTERNATIONAL SHOWCASE, INC., Petitioner,
v.
Saul MANDELL, Respondent.

No. 88-645.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 2, 1988.
Rehearing Denied September 6, 1988.

*1212 Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Michael Josephs and Denise V. Powers, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Stanley J. Bartel, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed in part for being overbroad, and the subject order is accordingly modified to require the petitioner to produce for the respondent's inspection the following corporate records pursuant to Section 607.157(4), Florida Statutes (1987), to wit: a copy of the corporate income tax returns, the general ledger of the corporation, the balance sheets of the corporation, the profit and loss statements of the corporation, and the corporate stockbook — as opposed to "all of [the corporation's] financial books and records" which are ordered produced by the order under review. Where, as here, a corporate stockholder's primary purpose in inspecting the corporation's books and records under the above statute is to determine the value of the stock owned by the stockholder, it has been held that, generally speaking, the above-stated business records are the sole relevant corporate records which the corporation must produce for inspection. Sage v. State ex rel. Perrone, 313 So. 2d 461, 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). No showing has been made in this case that additional records are needed to determine the value of respondent's corporate stock. See News-Journal Corp. v. State ex rel. Gore, 136 Fla. 620, 624, 187 So. 271, 272 (1939).

Certiorari granted; order under review modified.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer