Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Boswell v. State, 88-1320 (1989)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 88-1320 Visitors: 10
Judges: Barkdull, Jorgenson and Levy
Filed: May 02, 1989
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 544 So. 2d 243 (1989) Rufus BOSWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 88-1320. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 2, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1989. *244 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard F. Landau, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Rufus Boswell appeals the enhancement of his sentence. Fo
More
544 So. 2d 243 (1989)

Rufus BOSWELL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-1320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 2, 1989.
Rehearing Denied June 28, 1989.

*244 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard F. Landau, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Rufus Boswell appeals the enhancement of his sentence. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Boswell was charged with, inter alia, first-degree murder and display of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The jury convicted Boswell of the lesser included offense of manslaughter and of the firearm count. The trial court enhanced the manslaughter count, a second-degree felony, to a first-degree felony pursuant to section 775.087(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), a permissible reclassification when the jury specifically finds that a defendant has committed a crime using a weapon or firearm. No such finding was made by the jury and it was error, therefore, for the trial court to infer the requisite finding based upon the firearm conviction. State v. McKinnon, 540 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 1989). Conviction on one count of the indictment cannot be used to lengthen the sentence for a conviction on another count. McKinnon; Marshall v. State, 529 So. 2d 797 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The state's reliance upon Rios v. State, 510 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), is misplaced in light of McKinnon.

The sentence on the manslaughter count is vacated, and the cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer