Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McNair v. State, 89-2372 (1990)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 89-2372 Visitors: 8
Judges: Baskin, Ferguson and Jorgenson
Filed: Jun. 26, 1990
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 563 So. 2d 804 (1990) Clifford McNAIR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 89-2372. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 26, 1990. *805 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Although the trial court was under a misapprehension that the language of section 775.0
More
563 So. 2d 804 (1990)

Clifford McNAIR, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-2372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 26, 1990.

*805 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court was under a misapprehension that the language of section 775.084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), was mandatory and not permissive, see State v. Brown, 530 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1988), we nonetheless affirm the sentence under review; the sentence imposed falls within the sentencing guidelines, does not exceed the enhanced statutory maximum penalty for the crime, and therefore does not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer