Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Newberry v. State, 92-0711 (1993)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 92-0711 Visitors: 16
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 07, 1993
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 616 So. 2d 1093 (1993) Richard NEWBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 92-0711. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 7, 1993. Motion for Rehearing or Certification Denied May 10, 1993. *1094 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant's convic
More
616 So. 2d 1093 (1993)

Richard NEWBERRY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-0711.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 7, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing or Certification Denied May 10, 1993.

*1094 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's convictions for sexual battery with force or injury, burglary with assault or battery and robbery. We reverse the trial court's imposition of the habitual offender statute on appellant's conviction of sexual battery with force or injury because the habitual offender statute does not apply to this life felony. See ยง 794.011(3), Fla. Stat. (1991); Lamont v. State, 610 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1992). We also reverse the imposition of the habitual offender statute on appellant's conviction of burglary with assault or battery. When the trial court orally pronounced sentence, it did not sentence appellant as a habitual offender on this offense. See McBee v. State, 581 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We otherwise affirm the sentences imposed on each of appellant's convictions in all respects. We remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to correct its judgment and sentence consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer