Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

City of Melbourne v. Puma, 92-1038 (1993)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 92-1038 Visitors: 8
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 09, 1993
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 616 So. 2d 190 (1993) CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant, v. Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee. No. 92-1038. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 9, 1993. Paul R. Gougelman, III and Michael R. Riemenschneider of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant. Ralph Geilich, Melbourne, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Snyder v. Board of County Commissioners, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), juris. accepted, 605 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 19
More
616 So. 2d 190 (1993)

CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant,
v.
Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee.

No. 92-1038.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 9, 1993.

Paul R. Gougelman, III and Michael R. Riemenschneider of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant.

Ralph Geilich, Melbourne, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Snyder v. Board of County Commissioners, 595 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), juris. accepted, 605 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1992). See also ABG Real Estate Development Company of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns County, 608 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer