Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Harley Hotels, Inc. v. Doe, 92-2088 (1993)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 92-2088 Visitors: 16
Judges: Cobb
Filed: Feb. 05, 1993
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 614 So. 2d 1133 (1993) HARLEY HOTELS, INC., Etc., Petitioner, v. Jane DOE, Respondent. No. 92-2088. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 5, 1993. *1134 David W. Henry of McDonough, O'Neal & O'Dell, Orlando, for petitioner. Eric H. Faddis of Law Offices of Eric H. Faddis, P.A., Orlando, for respondent. COBB, Judge. Defendant herein, Harley Hotels, Inc., has petitioned for certiorari review of the trial court's non-final order granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to a
More
614 So. 2d 1133 (1993)

HARLEY HOTELS, INC., Etc., Petitioner,
v.
Jane DOE, Respondent.

No. 92-2088.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 5, 1993.

*1134 David W. Henry of McDonough, O'Neal & O'Dell, Orlando, for petitioner.

Eric H. Faddis of Law Offices of Eric H. Faddis, P.A., Orlando, for respondent.

COBB, Judge.

Defendant herein, Harley Hotels, Inc., has petitioned for certiorari review of the trial court's non-final order granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint to add a claim for punitive damages.

We are constrained to deny certiorari review of an order permitting a claim for punitive damages. Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 1987). In doing so, we acknowledge the defendant's valid concern regarding the extent of plaintiff's right to engage in discovery of defendant's financial resources. Nevertheless, we remind defendant that the supreme court has expressly approved the use of Rule 1.280(c) to limit such discovery. Tennant v. Charlton, 377 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1979).

CERTIORARI REVIEW DENIED.

COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer