Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mark Arnold Constr. v. Nat'l Lumber, 93-1480 (1994)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 93-1480 Visitors: 15
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Aug. 12, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 642 So. 2d 576 (1994) MARK C. ARNOLD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. NATIONAL LUMBER BROKERS, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 93-1480. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 12, 1994. Charles Evans Davis, Orlando, for appellant/cross-appellee. Ernest J. Myers of Moody, Salzman & Robertson, Gainesville, for appellee/cross-appellant. PER CURIAM. ORDER ON APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES In accordance with section 768.79, Florida Statutes, the appellee
More
642 So. 2d 576 (1994)

MARK C. ARNOLD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
NATIONAL LUMBER BROKERS, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 93-1480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 12, 1994.

Charles Evans Davis, Orlando, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Ernest J. Myers of Moody, Salzman & Robertson, Gainesville, for appellee/cross-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER ON APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

In accordance with section 768.79, Florida Statutes, the appellee (plaintiff below) served a pretrial demand for judgment in the amount of $50,000, which the appellant refused. A judgment in the amount of $176,715.00 was entered in the trial court on a jury verdict in favor of the appellee.[1] The trial court also awarded fees and costs because the judgment was "at least 25 percent greater than the offer." § 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (1993).

We align ourselves with the Fourth[2] and Fifth[3] District Courts of Appeal in granting, on the same grounds, the appellee's motion for an award of reasonable costs and attorney's fees incurred in successfully defending the judgment on appeal. § 768.79, Fla. Stat. (1993). Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate *577 Procedure 9.400, we remand for the trial court to determine the appropriate amount of the award.

BOOTH, ALLEN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] The trial court's judgment was affirmed per curiam in Mark C. Arnold Construction Company v. National Lumber Brokers, Inc., 641 So. 2d 868 (1994).

[2] Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036, 1043 n. 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

[3] Williams v. Brochu, 578 So. 2d 491, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer