Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gene B. Glick Company, Inc. v. Sunshine Ready Concrete Company, Inc., 94-0165 (1995)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 94-0165 Visitors: 8
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 23, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: 651 So. 2d 190 (1995) GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and BACK BAY APARTMENTS, Appellants, v. SUNSHINE READY CONCRETE COMPANY, INC., Appellee. No. 94-0165. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 23, 1995. Rehearing Denied March 28, 1995. Larry A. Karns, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants. Thomas D. Daiello of Marchbanks, Daiello & Leider, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court in all respects except we reverse as to th
More
651 So. 2d 190 (1995)

GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and BACK BAY APARTMENTS, Appellants,
v.
SUNSHINE READY CONCRETE COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. 94-0165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 23, 1995.
Rehearing Denied March 28, 1995.

Larry A. Karns, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Thomas D. Daiello of Marchbanks, Daiello & Leider, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court in all respects except we reverse as to that portion of the final judgment in favor of the appellee, Sunshine Ready Concrete Co., against the appellant, Back Bay Apartments for unjust enrichment.

Unjust enrichment is equitable in nature and cannot exist where payment has been made for the benefit conferred. Back Bay paid Glick Company the full amount of its contract for the construction project. Accordingly, there can be no unjust enrichment to support Sunshine's claim.

GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer