Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 04, 1996
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 684 So. 2d 264 (1996) J.A., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 96-2631. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 4, 1996. *265 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. We reverse the adjudication of delinquency in this case and rema
Summary: 684 So. 2d 264 (1996) J.A., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 96-2631. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 4, 1996. *265 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. We reverse the adjudication of delinquency in this case and reman..
More
684 So. 2d 264 (1996)
J.A., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-2631.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
December 4, 1996.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the adjudication of delinquency in this case and remand for appellant's discharge. The state has conceded error. Appellant, a ten year old boy, was found guilty of criminal mischief by starting a fire which damaged the property of another in violation of section 806.13, Florida Statutes (1995). "The offense of criminal mischief requires that the actor possess the specific intent to damage the property of another." In the Interest of J.G., 655 So. 2d 1284, 1285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The trial court found that appellant did not mean to start the fire. Thus, the trial court erroneously found appellant guilty of criminal mischief where appellant lacked the requisite intent.
Reversed and remanded.
WARNER, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
