Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roldan v. State, 97-1369 (1997)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 97-1369 Visitors: 8
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 18, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 695 So. 2d 864 (1997) Michael E. ROLDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-1369. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 18, 1997. Michael E. Roldan, Moore Haven, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant's rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not
More
695 So. 2d 864 (1997)

Michael E. ROLDAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-1369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 1997.

Michael E. Roldan, Moore Haven, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Richardson v. State, 677 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) and cases cited therein and Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S. Ct. 366, 88 L. Ed. 2d 203 (1985).

KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer