Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Scholz v. State, 97-4515 (1999)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 97-4515 Visitors: 10
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: May 26, 1999
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 734 So. 2d 526 (1999) Joseph SCHOLZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-4515. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 26, 1999. *527 Richard L. Rosenbaum of Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Leslie T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Joseph Scholz entered a no contest plea to DUI manslaughter and was sentenced to 126.4 months
More
734 So. 2d 526 (1999)

Joseph SCHOLZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-4515.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 26, 1999.

*527 Richard L. Rosenbaum of Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Leslie T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Scholz entered a no contest plea to DUI manslaughter and was sentenced to 126.4 months. On appeal, he argues that the court erred by including an additional 120 points for victim injury on his sentencing guidelines scoresheet. Appellant contends that the addition of victim injury points constitutes "double scoring" because death of a victim is an element of DUI manslaughter. We disagree and affirm appellant's sentence. See Wendt v. State, 711 So. 2d 1166, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) and Martinez v. State, 692 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 697 So. 2d 1217 (Fla.1997).

Appellant further argues that the trial court erred in refusing to order a downward departure sentence. Contrary to appellant's assertions, the record reflects that the trial judge was aware of his discretion to deviate from the guidelines but declined to do so after fully evaluating evidence submitted by appellant of mitigating factors under section 921.0016, Florida Statutes. We cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to depart from the recommended sentencing range in this case.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer