Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MR v. State, 2D99-4040 (2000)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D99-4040 Visitors: 5
Judges: Whatley
Filed: Nov. 01, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 777 So. 2d 995 (2000) M.R., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D99-4040. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 1, 2000. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Brad Permar, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. WHATLEY, Judge. M.R. appeals the trial court's adjudication of delinquency for violating Tampa's juvenile curf
More
777 So. 2d 995 (2000)

M.R., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D99-4040.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 1, 2000.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Brad Permar, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

WHATLEY, Judge.

M.R. appeals the trial court's adjudication of delinquency for violating Tampa's juvenile curfew ordinance. See Tampa, Fla., Code ยง 14-26(c) (1996). He argues that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We affirm under the authority of this court's recent decisions in J.P. v. State, 775 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and State v. T.M., 761 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

We again certify the following questions of great public importance:

WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT APPLY WHEN REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A JUVENILE CURFEW ORDNANCE?
WHETHER THE TAMPA JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE IS CONSTITUTIONAL?

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer