Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores, 3D03-453 (2003)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D03-453 Visitors: 11
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., Levy and Shevin
Filed: Dec. 17, 2003
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 870 So. 2d 127 (2003) MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Clara FLORES, Appellee. No. 3D03-453. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 17, 2003. Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004. *128 Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Lopez & Best and Virginia M. Best, Miami, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in t
More
870 So. 2d 127 (2003)

MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Clara FLORES, Appellee.

No. 3D03-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 17, 2003.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004.

*128 Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Lopez & Best and Virginia M. Best, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So. 2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane, 268 So. 2d 403, 404-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer