Judges: Gersten, Green, and Suarez
Filed: Sep. 01, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 937 So. 2d 235 (2006) Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D06-1641. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 1, 2006. Arthur W. Foley, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ. SUAREZ, J. The appellant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the State did not file an amended information after orally amending the information. We affirm the trial cou
Summary: 937 So. 2d 235 (2006) Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D06-1641. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 1, 2006. Arthur W. Foley, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ. SUAREZ, J. The appellant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the State did not file an amended information after orally amending the information. We affirm the trial cour..
More
937 So. 2d 235 (2006)
Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-1641.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
September 1, 2006.
Arthur W. Foley, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
The appellant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the State did not file an amended information after orally amending the information. We affirm the trial court's denial of the 3.800 motion. See State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla.1989).
