Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tejeda v. State, 3D06-2350 (2006)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D06-2350 Visitors: 2
Judges: Gersten, Green, and Ramirez
Filed: Nov. 15, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 943 So. 2d 267 (2006) Jorge TEJEDA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D06-2350. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 15, 2006. Jorge Tejeda, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. The claims appellant raised did not render the sentence "illegal" for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition. The claims should have been raised via 3.850 and are now time barred.
943 So. 2d 267 (2006)

Jorge TEJEDA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-2350.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 15, 2006.

Jorge Tejeda, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The claims appellant raised did not render the sentence "illegal" for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition. The claims should have been raised via 3.850 and are now time barred.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer