Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McKenzie v. State, 4D04-4836 (2006)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 4D04-4836 Visitors: 11
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Aug. 23, 2006
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 935 So. 2d 1281 (2006) Damien McKENZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D04-4836. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 23, 2006. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Dea Abramschmitt, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. *1282 PER CURIAM. The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravate
More
935 So. 2d 1281 (2006)

Damien McKENZIE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D04-4836.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 23, 2006.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Dea Abramschmitt, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*1282 PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated assault with a firearm. He raises three issues, none of which warrant a reversal. We therefore affirm, but write to address the trial court's suggestion that the defendant waived the motion to suppress by failing to file it prior to trial.

Rule 3.190(h) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that a "motion to suppress shall be made before trial unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the court may entertain the motion or an appropriate objection at the trial." This rule provides the trial court with discretion to entertain a motion to suppress at trial. In this case, the trial court indicated that the defendant had waived any motion to suppress by failing to file a written motion prior to trial. A motion to suppress is not automatically waived by not having been filed prior to trial. However, having reviewed the merits of the defendant's profferred motion, we find the court's reliance on waiver to be harmless.

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer