Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jul. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 936 So. 2d 651 (2006) Jose M. ARCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D05-3947. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 5, 2006. Jose M. Arce, Crawfordville, pro se. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Jose M. Arce appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We rev
Summary: 936 So. 2d 651 (2006) Jose M. ARCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D05-3947. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 5, 2006. Jose M. Arce, Crawfordville, pro se. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Jose M. Arce appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reve..
More
936 So. 2d 651 (2006)
Jose M. ARCE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-3947.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 5, 2006.
Jose M. Arce, Crawfordville, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Jose M. Arce appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand with respect to one of his three claims.
Arce alleged that one of the predicate offenses used to qualify him for habitual offender sentencing was not his conviction. Arce's claim is cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion if the error can be determined from the record. See Bover v. State, 797 So. 2d 1246 (Fla.2001). Our record does not contain documents to refute this legally sufficient claim. Sheffield v. State, 903 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further review of this point.
FARMER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
