Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Brown v. State, 4D06-3233 (2006)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 4D06-3233 Visitors: 9
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 18, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 940 So. 2d 498 (2006) Isac Quincy BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D06-3233. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 18, 2006. Isac Quincy Brown, South Bay, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the denial of Brown's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he seeks retroactive application of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S. Ct. 2531 , 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004). As we did in Thomas v. State, 914 S
More
940 So. 2d 498 (2006)

Isac Quincy BROWN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-3233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 18, 2006.

Isac Quincy Brown, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Brown's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he seeks retroactive application of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004). As we did in Thomas v. State, 914 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), to the extent that the court applied Blakely retroactively.

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer