Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sullivan v. State, 2D06-5546 (2007)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D06-5546 Visitors: 12
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 972 So. 2d 918 (2007) Willie SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D06-5546. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 5, 2007. James. Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Steven L. Bolotin, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Willie Sullivan challenges the trial court's decision allowing the State to have initia
More
972 So. 2d 918 (2007)

Willie SULLIVAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D06-5546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 5, 2007.

James. Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Steven L. Bolotin, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Willie Sullivan challenges the trial court's decision allowing the State to have initial and rebuttal closing arguments in accordance with section 918.19, Florida Statutes (2006), and argues that section 918.19 is unconstitutional. We affirm based on the reasoning in Grice v. State, 967 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2007).

Affirmed.

WALLACE and LaROSE, JJ., and LOGAN, PAUL E., Associate Judge, concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer