Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Acuna v. State, 3D06-2714 (2007)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D06-2714 Visitors: 2
Judges: Gersten, C.J., and Green and Shepherd
Filed: Oct. 10, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 965 So. 2d 1274 (2007) Ismenia ACUNA a/k/a Niurka Batista, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D06-2714. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 10, 2007. Ismenia Acuna a/k/a Niurka Batista, in proper person. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Michael C. Greenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, C.J., and GREEN and SHEPHERD, JJ. PER CURIAM. CONFESSION OF ERROR Based on the State's proper confession of error, we reverse the trial co
More
965 So. 2d 1274 (2007)

Ismenia ACUNA a/k/a Niurka Batista, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-2714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 10, 2007.

Ismenia Acuna a/k/a Niurka Batista, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Michael C. Greenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and GREEN and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

Based on the State's proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court's order denying defendant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion on ground one. On remand, the trial court shall consider Defendant's first point that she was sentenced in error as both a habitual felony offender and a violent career criminal. See Clines v. State, 912 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2005); Mesa v. State, 934 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

We affirm the order denying relief as to the second point.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer