Judges: Cope, Ramirez, and Wells
Filed: Jul. 23, 2008
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 987 So. 2d 195 (2008) Mark HERNANDEZ and Cecilia Jorge, Petitioners, v. Ada PORRES, Respondent. No. 3D08-1278. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 23, 2008. *196 Rex E. Russo, Coral Gables, for petitioners. Ada Porres, in proper person. Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ. RAMIREZ, J. Petitioners seek review of an order of the circuit court denying their petition for writ of mandamus, which is a non-final, non-appealable order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3); Mott v. Scofie
Summary: 987 So. 2d 195 (2008) Mark HERNANDEZ and Cecilia Jorge, Petitioners, v. Ada PORRES, Respondent. No. 3D08-1278. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 23, 2008. *196 Rex E. Russo, Coral Gables, for petitioners. Ada Porres, in proper person. Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ. RAMIREZ, J. Petitioners seek review of an order of the circuit court denying their petition for writ of mandamus, which is a non-final, non-appealable order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3); Mott v. Scofiel..
More
987 So. 2d 195 (2008)
Mark HERNANDEZ and Cecilia Jorge, Petitioners,
v.
Ada PORRES, Respondent.
No. 3D08-1278.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 23, 2008.
Rex E. Russo, Coral Gables, for petitioners.
Ada Porres, in proper person.
Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
RAMIREZ, J.
Petitioners seek review of an order of the circuit court denying their petition for writ of mandamus, which is a non-final, non-appealable order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3); Mott v. Scofield, 120 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). Thus, review of the circuit court's order is limited to certiorari review in this Court and not by appeal. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So. 2d 216, 217 (Fla.1998). For this reason, we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition. The circuit court properly denied mandamus because the county court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See Toledo v. Escamilla, 962 So. 2d 1028, 1030 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that when the defendant "asserted in her answer that she was not a tenant and that she had an equitable interest in the property, ejectment, not eviction, was the proper remedy, and the matter should have been transferred to the circuit court.").
Petition denied.
