Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Carpenter v. State, 5D07-2762 (2008)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D07-2762 Visitors: 4
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 13, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 983 So. 2d 760 (2008) Shawn Carlos CARPENTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D07-2762. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 13, 2008. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Shawn Carpenter appeals a judgment and sentence following a revocation of proba
More
983 So. 2d 760 (2008)

Shawn Carlos CARPENTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D07-2762.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 13, 2008.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Carpenter appeals a judgment and sentence following a revocation of probation. The probation violation concerned a skirmish that occurred at the alleged victim's home. At the violation *761 hearing, the victim was asked, "And during that altercation, you ended up being pushed by Mr. Carpenter; isn't that correct?" The victim responded, "No. Actually what happened was, I was calling 911, they were fighting, I got in be — tried to get in between them, and got pushed. And then the other guy fell on me." On cross-examination, the victim stated that Mr. Carpenter did not intentionally touch or strike her and any contact was accidental. Apparently, the victim's original statement to the police reflected that she called 911 when her former boyfriend and Mr. Carpenter began fighting and Mr. Carpenter subsequently pushed her and tried to push the phone out of her hand. Although the prosecutor showed the victim her original statement and questioned her in an attempt to impeach her testimony, no direct response was ever obtained.

The victim's purported prior inconsistent statement was not established and even had it been, a prior inconsistent statement is insufficient to sustain a violation of probation. Shaw v. State, 710 So. 2d 182, 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER, TORPY, and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer