Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FLAMILY v. City of Orlando, 1D04-2453 (2009)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 1D04-2453 Visitors: 12
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jul. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 14 So. 3d 254 (2009) Robert FLAMILY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CITY OF ORLANDO and City of Orlando Risk Management, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 1D04-2453. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 16, 2009. Geoffrey Bichler of Bichler & Kelley, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Danni Lynn Germano, Michael Broussard and Barbara Eagan of Broussard, Cullen, DeGailler & Eagan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants. PER CURIAM. We review this case on rema
More
14 So. 3d 254 (2009)

Robert FLAMILY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF ORLANDO and City of Orlando Risk Management, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

No. 1D04-2453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 2009.

Geoffrey Bichler of Bichler & Kelley, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Danni Lynn Germano, Michael Broussard and Barbara Eagan of Broussard, Cullen, DeGailler & Eagan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

We review this case on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. See Sanders v. City of Orlando, 997 So. 2d 1089 (Fla.2008). Claimant raises one issue on appeal, while the City raises four cross-appeal issues.

Claimant argues that the JCC erred in ruling the City was not estopped from denying compensability. We conclude that the JCC did not err in rejecting Claimant's estoppel argument. Further, we affirm the issues raised on cross-appeal without discussion.

The JCC's final order is AFFIRMED.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer