Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Murphy v. State, 1D09-4572 (2009)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 1D09-4572 Visitors: 1
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 31, 2009
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 24 So. 3d 1273 (2009) James L. MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D09-4572. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 31, 2009. James L. Murphy, pro se, Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Giselle Denise Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. Prior report: 903 So. 2d 194 . PER CURIAM. The appellant challenges the denial of his motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent that the app
More
24 So. 3d 1273 (2009)

James L. MURPHY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-4572.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 31, 2009.

James L. Murphy, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Giselle Denise Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Prior report: 903 So. 2d 194.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the denial of his motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent that the appellant's prior rule 3.850 motion only addressed the appellant's convictions resulting from his plea agreement and the appellant's instant rule 3.850 motion only addresses his convictions following his jury trial. Because there were separate judgments and sentences entered in the appellant's case, the instant motion does not appear to be successive. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the lower court to address the appellant's claims on the merits.

REVERSED.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer