Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Acosta v. F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC., 3D08-1338 (2009)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D08-1338 Visitors: 13
Judges: Gersten, C.J., and Suarez and Cortiã?as
Filed: Jan. 07, 2009
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 997 So. 2d 1279 (2009) Jose Francisco ACOSTA, Appellant, v. F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 3D08-1338. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 7, 2009. Thomas E. Elfers, Miami, for appellant. Abadin Cook, Aldo M. Leiva, and Erin E. Dardis, Miami, for appellee, F & R Scaffolds, Inc. Before GERSTEN, C.J., and SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ. PER CURIAM. Jose Francisco Acosta ("Acosta") appeals from the trial court's order denying plaintiff's second petition for writ of m
More
997 So. 2d 1279 (2009)

Jose Francisco ACOSTA, Appellant,
v.
F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D08-1338.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 7, 2009.

Thomas E. Elfers, Miami, for appellant.

Abadin Cook, Aldo M. Leiva, and Erin E. Dardis, Miami, for appellee, F & R Scaffolds, Inc.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Jose Francisco Acosta ("Acosta") appeals from the trial court's order denying plaintiff's second petition for writ of mandamus or alternatively, motion to compel business records. Because we find this order is non-final and non-appealable, we dismiss the appeal for lack jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130. We also exercise our discretion and decline to entertain the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c).

Dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer