Judges: Cope, Ramirez, and Salter
Filed: Jan. 28, 2009
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 1 So. 3d 365 (2009) UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez, Respondent. No. 3D08-2867. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 28, 2009. *366 Michael J. Neimand, Miami, for petitioner. Jose R. Iglesia; Armando Brana, for respondent. Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SALTER, JJ. CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. Based on respondent Professional Medical Group, Inc., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez's confession of error, we gra
Summary: 1 So. 3d 365 (2009) UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez, Respondent. No. 3D08-2867. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 28, 2009. *366 Michael J. Neimand, Miami, for petitioner. Jose R. Iglesia; Armando Brana, for respondent. Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SALTER, JJ. CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. Based on respondent Professional Medical Group, Inc., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez's confession of error, we gran..
More
1 So. 3d 365 (2009)
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez, Respondent.
No. 3D08-2867.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
January 28, 2009.
Michael J. Neimand, Miami, for petitioner.
Jose R. Iglesia; Armando Brana, for respondent.
Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SALTER, JJ.
CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Based on respondent Professional Medical Group, Inc., a/a/o Raquel Gutierrez's confession of error, we grant petitioner United Automobile Insurance Company's Petition for Writ of Certioriari. Respondent agrees with petitioner that the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, acting in its appellate capacity, departed from the essential requirements of the law when it awarded respondent appellate attorney's fees and costs. The respondent was not the prevailing party in the trial court. Pursuant to Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Company, 944 So. 2d 252 (Fla.2006), an appellate court cannot award appellate attorney's fees to an insured unless the insured prevails on appeal.
Therefore, we conclude that the appellate division of the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in this case in granting the fees and costs to respondent. We thus grant the petition and quash the order granting these conditional fees and costs to respondent.
