Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kingsland v. MATEER & HARBERT, PA, 5D08-2544 (2009)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D08-2544 Visitors: 7
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 09, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2020
Summary: 18 So. 3d 1252 (2009) Robert KINGSLAND and B.K. Ranch, L.C., Appellants, v. MATEER & HARBERT, P.A., et al., Appellees. No. 5D08-2544. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. October 9, 2009. James D. Kisio, of James D. Kisio, P.A., Longwood, for Appellant. W. Scott Gabrielson and John D. Hanebrink, of Mateer & Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Mateer & Harbert, P.A. Charles J. Meltz and T'Anjuiming A. Marx, of Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, Eide & Telan, P.A., Orlando, fo
More
18 So. 3d 1252 (2009)

Robert KINGSLAND and B.K. Ranch, L.C., Appellants,
v.
MATEER & HARBERT, P.A., et al., Appellees.

No. 5D08-2544.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

October 9, 2009.

James D. Kisio, of James D. Kisio, P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.

W. Scott Gabrielson and John D. Hanebrink, of Mateer & Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Mateer & Harbert, P.A.

Charles J. Meltz and T'Anjuiming A. Marx, of Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, Eide & Telan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Baker & Fuller, P.A.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amended order of the trial court dismissing the third-party complaint filed by appellants, Robert Kingsland and B.K. Ranch, L.C., against the *1253 appellees, Mateer & Harbert, P.A., and Baker & Fuller, P.A. We note for the benefit of the parties and the trial court, however, that our disposition of this appeal does not serve as an adjudication on the merits of the current first-party claim by the appellants against the appellees.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer