Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Black v. City of Jacksonville, 1D10-1727 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 1D10-1727 Visitors: 17
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 37 So. 3d 924 (2010) Timothy BLACK, Petitioner, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, et al., Respondents. No. 1D10-1727. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 9, 2010. Timothy Black, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents. PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Circuit Court for Duval County to enter a final order in his tort action against the City of Jacksonville. However, petitioner has not filed a proper motion for such relief. See Ponton v. Gross, 5
More
37 So. 3d 924 (2010)

Timothy BLACK, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, et al., Respondents.

No. 1D10-1727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 2010.

Timothy Black, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Circuit Court for Duval County to enter a final order in his tort action against the City of Jacksonville. However, petitioner has not filed a proper motion for such relief. See Ponton v. Gross, 576 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Once a motion is filed, it must be called up for a hearing. Smartt v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 771 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

*925 The petition for writ of mandamus is accordingly denied.

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer