Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hawkins v. Hawkins, 1D10-5103 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 1D10-5103 Visitors: 2
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Nov. 30, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 48 So. 3d 943 (2010) Carter G. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. Mary G. HAWKINS, Appellee. No. 1D10-5103. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 30, 2010. Carter G. Hawkins, pro se, Appellant. Michael D. Weinstock, Niceville, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The order on appeal fails to distribute the proceeds from the sale of the partitioned properties. Accordingly, it is neither a final order nor a non-final order for which an interlocutory appeal may be prosecuted under rule 9.130(a)(3)
More
48 So. 3d 943 (2010)

Carter G. HAWKINS, Appellant,
v.
Mary G. HAWKINS, Appellee.

No. 1D10-5103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 30, 2010.

Carter G. Hawkins, pro se, Appellant.

Michael D. Weinstock, Niceville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order on appeal fails to distribute the proceeds from the sale of the partitioned properties. Accordingly, it is neither a final order nor a non-final order for which an interlocutory appeal may be prosecuted under rule 9.130(a)(3), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See generally Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So. 2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) ("[a] final judgment is one which ends the litigation between the parties and disposes of all issues involved such that no further action by the court will be necessary"); Hoffman v. O'Connor, 802 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (dismissing appeal from order of dissolution of marriage that reserved jurisdiction to determine equitable distribution).

DISMISSED.

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, AND THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer