Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CP v. State, 2D09-707 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D09-707 Visitors: 6
Judges: Larose
Filed: Apr. 21, 2010
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 31 So. 3d 976 (2010) C.P., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D09-707. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 21, 2010. *977 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Danilo Cruz-Carino, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. LaROSE, Judge. C.P. was adjudicated delinquent for throwing a deadly missile into an occupied vehicle. On app
More
31 So. 3d 976 (2010)

C.P., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D09-707.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 21, 2010.

*977 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Danilo Cruz-Carino, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

C.P. was adjudicated delinquent for throwing a deadly missile into an occupied vehicle. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in imposing a $250 public defender fee without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard.[1] We agree and the State concedes error. Accordingly, C.P.'s adjudication and sentence are affirmed. We reverse the imposition of the $250 public defender fee and remand to the trial court to strike it. The trial court may reimpose the fee only if it provides C.P. with notice of its intent to do so and the opportunity to be heard at a hearing on the matter. See McMillan v. State, 8 So. 3d 1237, 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Bruno v. State, 960 So. 2d 907, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

VILLANTI and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

NOTES

[1] The issue was preserved by the filing of a Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b) motion to correct disposition or commitment error. The trial court did not rule on the motion within thirty days; thus, it is deemed denied. Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.135(b)(1)(B); O.H. v. State, 948 So. 2d 79, 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer