Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Montgomery v. State, 3D09-1859 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D09-1859 Visitors: 26
Judges: Gersten and Cortiã?as, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Filed: Jan. 27, 2010
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 27 So. 3d 134 (2010) Reginald MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D09-1859. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 27, 2010. Reginald Montgomery, in proper person. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee. Before GERSTEN and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unle
More
27 So. 3d 134 (2010)

Reginald MONTGOMERY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D09-1859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 27, 2010.

Reginald Montgomery, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer