Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARRIAGA v. State, 3D10-1357 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D10-1357 Visitors: 17
Judges: Cope and Cortiã?as, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Filed: Aug. 18, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 44 So. 3d 155 (2010) Juan MARRIAGA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D10-1357. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 18, 2010. Rehearing Denied October 7, 2010. *156 Juan Marriaga, in proper person. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The defendant con
More
44 So. 3d 155 (2010)

Juan MARRIAGA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-1357.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 18, 2010.
Rehearing Denied October 7, 2010.

*156 Juan Marriaga, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The defendant contends that he does not qualify as a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes.

The defendant was convicted of attempted sexual battery. The State response indicates that the crime was committed on a victim less than twelve years of age and that the crime was a felony of the first degree.

The defendant argues that as of the 1997 crime date, the Florida Sexual Predators Act did not apply to attempts. Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942, 944-45 (Fla. 2005). Attempts were added to the Act in 1998. Id.

As we interpret the Therrien decision, the question whether an offender qualifies under the Act is to be decided as of the date of sentencing. See id. at 944. At the time of defendant's sentencing in 1999, an offender qualified under the Act if the offense was an attempt to commit a capital, life, or first-degree felony violation of chapter 794. § 775.21(4)(c)1.b., Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).

The defendant argues that he is entitled to relief under Therrien, but he is incorrect. At the time of the sentencing in Therrien, attempts had not yet been added to the statute. At the time of this defendant's sentencing, the "attempt" provision had gone into effect. We therefore affirm the trial court's order on this issue, and affirm on the remaining issue without comment.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer