Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Diaz v. State, 5D09-2946 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D09-2946 Visitors: 2
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Sep. 03, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 43 So. 3d 874 (2010) Joseph DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D09-2946. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. September 3, 2010. *875 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We find no reversible error in this Anders [1] appeal. There is, however, a minor
More
43 So. 3d 874 (2010)

Joseph DIAZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D09-2946.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 3, 2010.

*875 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find no reversible error in this Anders[1] appeal. There is, however, a minor error relating to the classification of the Defendant's conviction which was referenced in the Anders brief filed on appeal.[2] After a full and independent review of the record, we affirm the Defendant's conviction and sentence but remand to the trial court to correct the Defendant's judgment of conviction to reflect that the Defendant's conviction for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery (with a firearm) is a first-degree felony punishable by life rather than a life felony. The jury specifically found that the Defendant did not personally possess, carry, display, use or threaten to use a firearm at the time he committed the felony. Therefore, the degree of the crime could not be reclassified as a life felony. This correction does not affect the validity of the conviction or the sentence imposed.

Remand for correction; otherwise AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).

[2] This issue was raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion. However, the trial court did not timely rule on this motion and it is deemed denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer