Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RAKOSKI v. State, 5D09-813 (2010)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D09-813 Visitors: 9
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 18, 2010
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 37 So. 3d 391 (2010) Tina Marie RAKOSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D09-813. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 18, 2010. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Tina Marie Rakoski appeals her sentence and the denial of her motion to correct sente
More
37 So. 3d 391 (2010)

Tina Marie RAKOSKI, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D09-813.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 18, 2010.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Tina Marie Rakoski appeals her sentence and the denial of her motion to correct sentence. We affirm without discussion, except as to condition number 30 of Rakoski's community control order. We strike condition 30 as the statute cited as authority for the assessment of this cost, section 948.02, Florida Statutes, was renumbered in 1977 as section 945.26, Florida Statutes (1977), which in turn was repealed in 1985. See Ch. 85-288 ยง 27, Laws of Fla.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer