Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KULO v. State, 5D11-2318 (2012)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D11-2318 Visitors: 29
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Mar. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 83 So. 3d 979 (2012) John Mark KULO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D11-2318. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 23, 2012. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. John Kulo, Jasper, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction
More
83 So. 3d 979 (2012)

John Mark KULO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D11-2318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 23, 2012.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

John Kulo, Jasper, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener's error. The order reflects that the appellant violated conditions of probation 6 and 8. The record demonstrates, however, that he was found to have violated condition 5 and a special condition concerning attendance at AA meetings. The order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer