Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lemus v. Shrimp Market, 13-1443 (2014)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 13-1443 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 9, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D13-1443 Lower Tribunal No. 10-61217 _ Hannia T. Lemus, Appellant, vs. Shrimp Market of South Florida, Inc., Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marc Schumacher, Judge. Sina Negahbani, for appellant. Isicoff, Ragatz & Koenigsberg and Eric D. Isicoff and Teresa Ragatz, for appellee. Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and SUAREZ and
More
       Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                            Opinion filed July 9, 2014.
         Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                               ________________

                               No. 3D13-1443
                         Lower Tribunal No. 10-61217
                             ________________


                              Hannia T. Lemus,
                                    Appellant,

                                          vs.

                 Shrimp Market of South Florida, Inc.,
                                       Appellee.



     An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marc
Schumacher, Judge.

      Sina Negahbani, for appellant.

      Isicoff, Ragatz & Koenigsberg and Eric D. Isicoff and Teresa Ragatz, for
appellee.


Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and SUAREZ and SCALES, JJ.

      SHEPHERD, C.J.
                               ON MOTION
                         FOR REHEARING GRANTED


      Just as we recently summarily affirmed the decision of the trial court in this

case by citation per curiam affirmance to our opinion in Delva v. Continental

Group, Inc., 
96 So. 3d 956
(Fla. 3d DCA 2012), and having been in the meantime

reversed by the Florida Supreme Court; we now withdraw that opinion and

summarily reverse the case before us on the strength of yet higher authority. See

Delva v. Cont’l Grp., Inc., 
137 So. 3d 371
(Fla. 2014) (extending the definition of

discrimination based on sex to include discrimination on the basis of pregnancy).

      Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer