Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TERRY DEWAYNE GIDEON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D13-4173 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 21, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B.
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA TERRY DEWAYNE GIDEON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D13-4173 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 21, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. S..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
TERRY DEWAYNE GIDEON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D13-4173
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed July 21, 2014.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
J. Scott Duncan, Judge.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg and Jay Kubica,
Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Terry Dewayne Gideon challenges his designation as a Prison Releasee
Reoffender (PRR) and the resulting mandatory minimum sentence. We reject
Gideon’s argument that eligibility for PRR sentencing is a fact which must be
submitted to the jury. See Williams v. State, --- So. 3d ---, 39 Fla. L. Weekly
D1336 (Fla. 1st DCA June 25, 2014), and Lopez v. State,
135 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2014). As for the argument that eligibility for PRR sentencing is an element
which must be alleged in the charging document, we find this argument to be
without merit. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224,
118 S. Ct.
1219,
140 L. Ed. 2d 350 (1998).
AFFIRMED.
VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
2