Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RIVERCREEK PRESERVE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND LIABILITY COMPANY, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED WILLIAM E. GLENN AND PATRICIA W. GLENN, CASE NO. 1D14-1568 Appellants, v. AMERIS BANK, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 8, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Victor Lawson Hulslander, Judge. Stephen C. Bullock, Lake City; Steven R. Browning, Jacksonville; an
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RIVERCREEK PRESERVE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND LIABILITY COMPANY, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED WILLIAM E. GLENN AND PATRICIA W. GLENN, CASE NO. 1D14-1568 Appellants, v. AMERIS BANK, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 8, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Victor Lawson Hulslander, Judge. Stephen C. Bullock, Lake City; Steven R. Browning, Jacksonville; and..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
RIVERCREEK PRESERVE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
LIABILITY COMPANY, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM E. GLENN AND
PATRICIA W. GLENN, CASE NO. 1D14-1568
Appellants,
v.
AMERIS BANK,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed July 8, 2014.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.
Victor Lawson Hulslander, Judge.
Stephen C. Bullock, Lake City; Steven R. Browning, Jacksonville; and William H.
Rogner, Winter Park, for Appellants.
Frederick R. Brock, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 6,
2014, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not one which
determines jurisdiction of the person. Cf. Keehn v. Joseph C. Mackey and Co.,
420 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to
review the order by appeal. Moreover, we decline appellants’ suggestion that we
undertake certiorari review, concluding that appellants have failed to demonstrate
entitlement to such relief. Belair v. Drew,
770 So. 2d 1164, 1166 (Fla. 2000).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
BENTON, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
2