Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Averitt McKenzie v. State of Florida, 15-0152 (2015)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 15-0152 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA AVERITT MCKENZIE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-0152 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _/ Opinion filed May 8, 2015. Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel - Original Jurisdiction. Averitt McKenzie, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Averitt McKenzie presents a tim
More
                                        IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                        FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

AVERITT MCKENZIE,                       NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                        FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Petitioner,                       DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                      CASE NO. 1D15-0152

STATE OF FLORIDA,

     Respondent.
___________________________/

Opinion filed May 8, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original
Jurisdiction.

Averitt McKenzie, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.




PER CURIAM.

      Averitt McKenzie presents a timely claim that he was denied the effective

assistance of counsel on direct appeal. Among his claims, we find merit only in his

assertion that appellate counsel was ineffective for failure to challenge the assessment

of a $100 “sheriff’s office investigative cost” where that cost was not requested,

documented, subjected to argument concerning the amount, or orally pronounced. See,
e.g., Pruitt v. State, 
98 So. 3d 231
(Fla. 1st DCA 2012), receded from on other grounds

by Spear v. State, 
109 So. 3d 232
(Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (en banc). On this basis, we

grant the petition, and concluding that a new appeal concerning this limited issue is

unnecessary, we remand with directions to strike this assessment.

      PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

LEWIS, C.J., WETHERELL and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer