Filed: Aug. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 5, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-887 Lower Tribunal No. 13-15503 _ J.C., the mother, Appellant, vs. The Department of Children, etc., et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C. Figarola, Judge. Richard F. Joyce, for appellant. Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Laura E. Lawson (Sanford), for the Guardian ad L
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 5, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-887 Lower Tribunal No. 13-15503 _ J.C., the mother, Appellant, vs. The Department of Children, etc., et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C. Figarola, Judge. Richard F. Joyce, for appellant. Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Laura E. Lawson (Sanford), for the Guardian ad Li..
More
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 5, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D15-887 Lower Tribunal No. 13-15503 ________________ J.C., the mother, Appellant, vs. The Department of Children, etc., et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C. Figarola, Judge. Richard F. Joyce, for appellant. Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Laura E. Lawson (Sanford), for the Guardian ad Litem Program. Before ROTHENBERG, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM. Appellant J.C. appeals a final judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her daughter. We find the order on appeal to be less than precise in articulating that (i) J.C. materially breached her case plan, and (ii) J.C. would be unlikely or unable to comply substantially with the case plan by the time of its expiration. We conclude, however, that record evidence, together with the trial court’s detailed consideration of J.C.’s conduct, support a finding that (i) J.C. materially breached her case plan, as provided in section 39.806(1)(e)2. of the Florida Statutes, and (ii) clear and convincing evidence in the record establishes that J.C. would be unlikely or unable to comply substantially with the case plan within its twelve-month duration. We agree with the Department of Children & Families that citation to section 39.806(1)(e)1. in the conclusion of the trial court’s order constitutes harmless error. Affirmed. 2