Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thriving Investments, LLC v. Chao, 15-1599 (2015)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 15-1599 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 23, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-1599 Lower Tribunal No. 14-24391 _ Thriving Investments, LLC, Appellant, vs. Anthony Chao, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John Schlesinger, Judge. Shutts & Bowen, LLP, and Aliette D. Rodz, Stephen T. Maher, and Alfredo L. Gonzalez, Jr., for appellant. Reyes Law Group, P.A.,
More
       Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                        Opinion filed December 23, 2015.
         Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                               ________________

                               No. 3D15-1599
                         Lower Tribunal No. 14-24391
                             ________________


                       Thriving Investments, LLC,
                                    Appellant,

                                        vs.

                            Anthony Chao, et al.,
                                    Appellees.


     An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, John Schlesinger, Judge.

     Shutts & Bowen, LLP, and Aliette D. Rodz, Stephen T. Maher, and Alfredo
L. Gonzalez, Jr., for appellant.

      Reyes Law Group, P.A., and Phillip A. Ortiz (Davie); Edward F. Holodak,
P.A. (Plantation); Louis C. Arslanian (Hollywood); Obront Corey, PLLC, and
Michael J. Corey, for appellees.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

     LOGUE, J.
      Thriving Investments, LLC, a third-party purchaser, appeals the denial of its

motion to set aside a final judgment of foreclosure. After purchasing a property at a

judicial foreclosure sale, the third-party purchaser apparently became aware that

the final judgment might have foreclosed only a second mortgage and the

purchased property might be subject to a first mortgage. The third-party purchaser

moved to set aside the final judgment upon which the foreclosure sale was based.

In moving to set aside the final judgment, which had been agreed to by the parties

to the foreclosure action, the third-party purchaser contended that the foreclosing

plaintiff lacked standing to foreclose, the judgment awarded excess interest, and

the underlying motion for summary judgment contained factual misrepresentations.

The trial court properly held that the third-party purchaser was a stranger to the

foreclosure action and lacked standing to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure.

This appeal is accordingly dismissed because “[t]he general rule is that a non-party

is a stranger to the record who cannot transfer jurisdiction to the appellate court.”

YHT & Assocs., Inc. v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D2208 (Fla. 2d

DCA Sept. 30, 2015) (citations and quotations omitted).

      Dismissed.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer