Filed: Dec. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 30, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ Nos. 3D15-2303 & 3D15-2271 Lower Tribunal No. 14-A369OZE _ Florida Attorney General, etc., et al., Appellants, vs. Luis Torres Jimenez, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Steven Leifman, Judge. Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellants. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorn
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 30, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ Nos. 3D15-2303 & 3D15-2271 Lower Tribunal No. 14-A369OZE _ Florida Attorney General, etc., et al., Appellants, vs. Luis Torres Jimenez, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Steven Leifman, Judge. Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellants. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorne..
More
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 30, 2015.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
Nos. 3D15-2303 & 3D15-2271
Lower Tribunal No. 14-A369OZE
________________
Florida Attorney General, etc., et al.,
Appellants,
vs.
Luis Torres Jimenez,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Steven Leifman,
Judge.
Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes and
Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellants.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Dietz, Jr., Assistant
Attorney General, as Intervener for appellants.
Louis C. Arslanian (Hollywood); Ted Hollander (Fort Lauderdale), for
appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
ON MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE STAY
Appellant’s motion to modify or vacate stay as applied to all pending red
light cases is stricken on the basis that Appellant, Luis Torres Jimenez, lacks
standing. Solares v. City of Miami,
166 So. 3d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“For
a court of law operating as one of the three branches of government under the
doctrine of the separation of powers, standing is a threshold issue which must be
resolved before reaching the merits of a case. Before a court can consider whether
an action is illegal, the court must be presented with a justiciable case or
controversy between parties who have standing.”). This disposition is not a ruling
on the merits of the motion.
Motion stricken.
2