Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT A. DOUGLAS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO VICTOR NEAL AND CARL FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND COOK, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellants, CASE NO. 1D15-4362 v. CHAPELLE A. BRONSON AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS, Appellees. _/ Opinion filed December 1, 2015. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tyrie W. Boyer, Judge. Candace W. Padgett and Leonard T. Hac
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT A. DOUGLAS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO VICTOR NEAL AND CARL FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND COOK, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellants, CASE NO. 1D15-4362 v. CHAPELLE A. BRONSON AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS, Appellees. _/ Opinion filed December 1, 2015. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tyrie W. Boyer, Judge. Candace W. Padgett and Leonard T. Hack..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT A. DOUGLAS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO VICTOR NEAL AND CARL FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND COOK, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellants, CASE NO. 1D15-4362 v. CHAPELLE A. BRONSON AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS, Appellees. _____________________________/ Opinion filed December 1, 2015. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tyrie W. Boyer, Judge. Candace W. Padgett and Leonard T. Hackett, of Vernis & Bowling of North Florida, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellants. Archibald J. Thomas, III, Samuel B. Kanupp and Ronald Angerer, II, of Thomas & Klink, Jacksonville, for Appellees (no appearances). PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of appellants’ response to the order of October 1, 2015, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not subject to appellate review pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(x) or (xi) because the order does not make a determination, as a matter of law, that a party is not entitled to either immunity under section 768.28(9), Florida Statutes, or sovereign immunity. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. ROBERTS, C. J., SWANSON and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR. 2
