Filed: Oct. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANGEL MANUEL NIEVES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D08-3809 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed October 30, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge. Lee Hollander of Law Offices of Hollander and Hanuka, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORI
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANGEL MANUEL NIEVES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D08-3809 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed October 30, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge. Lee Hollander of Law Offices of Hollander and Hanuka, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORID..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ANGEL MANUEL NIEVES, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D08-3809
)
STATE OF FLORIDA, )
)
Appellee. )
___________________________________ )
Opinion filed October 30, 2015.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee
County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge.
Lee Hollander of Law Offices of Hollander
and Hanuka, Naples, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
PER CURIAM.
Upon remand from the Florida Supreme Court, we reconsider Angel
Manuel Nieves' conviction for second-degree murder in light of the subsequent decision
in Griffin v. State,
160 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 2015). In Griffin, the Florida Supreme Court
clarified that "a sole defense of misidentification does not concede or fail to place in
dispute intent or any other element of the crime charged except identity when the
offense charged is an unlawful homicide."
Id. at 67. Accordingly, the jury instruction for
manslaughter by act given in this case did indeed constitute fundamental error, and we
must reverse and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-2-