Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nieves v. State, 2D08-3809 (2015)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D08-3809 Visitors: 33
Filed: Oct. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANGEL MANUEL NIEVES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D08-3809 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed October 30, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge. Lee Hollander of Law Offices of Hollander and Hanuka, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORI
More
                                              IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                              OF FLORIDA
                                              SECOND DISTRICT



ANGEL MANUEL NIEVES,                )
                                    )
           Appellant,               )
                                    )
v.                                  )                    Case No. 2D08-3809
                                    )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                   )
                                    )
           Appellee.                )
___________________________________ )

Opinion filed October 30, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee
County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge.

Lee Hollander of Law Offices of Hollander
and Hanuka, Naples, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


              ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PER CURIAM.

              Upon remand from the Florida Supreme Court, we reconsider Angel

Manuel Nieves' conviction for second-degree murder in light of the subsequent decision

in Griffin v. State, 
160 So. 3d 63
(Fla. 2015). In Griffin, the Florida Supreme Court

clarified that "a sole defense of misidentification does not concede or fail to place in

dispute intent or any other element of the crime charged except identity when the

offense charged is an unlawful homicide." 
Id. at 67.
Accordingly, the jury instruction for
manslaughter by act given in this case did indeed constitute fundamental error, and we

must reverse and remand for a new trial.

             Reversed and remanded for new trial.



WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.




                                           -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer