Filed: Feb. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 10, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-1372 Lower Tribunal No. 12-1967 _ SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Appellant, vs. Ileana Garcia, etc., et al., Appellees. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gerald Hubbart, Senior Judge. Gray Robinson, Alexandra de Alejo, and David S. Hendrix, (Tampa), for appellant. The Ticktin Law Group, and Kendrick Almaguer, (Deerfield Beac
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 10, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-1372 Lower Tribunal No. 12-1967 _ SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Appellant, vs. Ileana Garcia, etc., et al., Appellees. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gerald Hubbart, Senior Judge. Gray Robinson, Alexandra de Alejo, and David S. Hendrix, (Tampa), for appellant. The Ticktin Law Group, and Kendrick Almaguer, (Deerfield Beach..
More
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed February 10, 2016.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-1372
Lower Tribunal No. 12-1967
________________
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.,
Appellant,
vs.
Ileana Garcia, etc., et al.,
Appellees.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gerald Hubbart,
Senior Judge.
Gray Robinson, Alexandra de Alejo, and David S. Hendrix, (Tampa), for
appellant.
The Ticktin Law Group, and Kendrick Almaguer, (Deerfield Beach), for
appellee, Ileana Garcia.
Before WELLS, SHEPHERD and LAGOA, JJ.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
WELLS, Judge.
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. appeals from an order granting summary judgment
in mortgagor Ileana Garcia’s favor on a finding that the notice of default provided
to Garcia failed to comply with the notice provisions detailed in paragraph 221 of
the mortgage being foreclosed. On Garcia’s commendable confession of error and
our review of the record, we agree that the notice2 provided substantially complies
1 Paragraph 22 of the mortgage, in pertinent part, provides:
22. Acceleration; Remedies. Lender shall give notice to Borrower
prior to acceleration following Borrower’s breach of any covenant or
agreement in this Security Instrument (but not prior to acceleration
under Section 18 unless Applicable Law provides otherwise). The
notice shall specify: (a) the default; (b) the action required to cure the
default; (c) a date, not less than 30 days from the date the notice is
given to Borrower, by which the default must be cured; and (d) that
failure to cure the default on or before the date specified in the notice
may result in acceleration of the sums secured by this Security
Instrument, foreclosure by judicial proceeding and sale of the
Property. The notice shall further inform Borrower of the right to
reinstate after acceleration and the right to assert in the foreclosure
proceeding the non-existence of a default or any other defense of
Borrower to acceleration and foreclosure.
2 In April 2011, Garcia stopped paying the monthly installments on the note
secured by the mortgage at issue here. On May 9, 2011, SunTrust sent Garcia a
“Default Notice” stating:
This is a notice that the above referenced property secured by the
Deed of Trust/Mortgage is in default. The loan is now due for the 04-
01-11 installment; therefore, you are in default for the total amount
shown above [$1,890.66] which includes mortgage payments, late
charges, and any additional fees that may have accrued. The amount
of the default will increase when an additional payment or an
additional late charge becomes due. In order to reinstate the loan,
please remit, in guaranteed funds, the total amount due including any
additional payments or late charges that become due, along with any
2
with paragraph 22 of the mortgage. See Bank of Am. v. Cadet, No. 3D15-669
(Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 20, 2016) (confirming that default notices are reviewed under
“ordinary contract principles” which under Florida law, requires only substantial
compliance with contractual provisions); Bank of New York Mellon v. Nunez, 40
Fla. L. Weekly D2486 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 4, 2015) (confirming that a mortgagee’s
default notice to a mortgagor, which is a condition precedent to foreclosure, need
only substantially and not strictly comply with the requirements set forth in a
mortgage governing such notices).
We therefore reverse the order under review and remand for reinstatement of
this action.
fees for a market analysis or appraisal that will be ordered within the
next few days.
If reinstatement funds are not received within thirty days from the
date of this letter [May 09, 2011], it may become necessary to
accelerate the entire balance of the loan. Should the entire unpaid
balance of the loan be accelerated foreclosure proceedings will be
instituted in accordance with the aforementioned Deed of
Trust/Mortgage. The loan may be reinstated prior to the fifth day
before the date of the foreclosure sale by tendering, in certified funds,
the entire delinquent amount including any additional payments which
become due, all late charges, fees and other expenses incurred by the
lender (not applicable to VA Guaranteed loans). In the event that the
loan is not reinstated, sale will occur as scheduled.
You have the right to bring a court action at any time to assert the
non-existence of default or any other defenses you might have to
acceleration and sale. The seriousness of this matter should not be
disregarded.
3
4