Filed: Nov. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BEVERLY RANKINE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-2892 AMR CORPORATION AND SEDGWICK CLAIM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed November 4, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Gerardo Castiello, Judge. Date of Accident: March 15, 2012. Bill McCabe, Longwood, and Kevin R. Gallagher of The Gallagher Law Group
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BEVERLY RANKINE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-2892 AMR CORPORATION AND SEDGWICK CLAIM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed November 4, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Gerardo Castiello, Judge. Date of Accident: March 15, 2012. Bill McCabe, Longwood, and Kevin R. Gallagher of The Gallagher Law Group,..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
BEVERLY RANKINE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-2892
AMR CORPORATION AND
SEDGWICK CLAIM
MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed November 4, 2016.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.
Gerardo Castiello, Judge.
Date of Accident: March 15, 2012.
Bill McCabe, Longwood, and Kevin R. Gallagher of The Gallagher Law Group,
P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.
Clinton C. Lyons, Jr. of Moran Kidd Lyons Johnson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The court having received the August 22, 2016, order of the Supreme Court
of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of October 22, 2015, and remanding the
matter for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192
So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion,
the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED and this case is
REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.
OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
2
