Filed: Jul. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CORRINE PUCCI, FORMER NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO WIFE, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D15-3747 v. GARY JOHNSON, FORMER HUSBAND, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 25, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Elizabeth Senterfitt, Judge. Caleb D. Rowland and William M. Blume, Blume & Rowland, PLLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Beth M. Terry, Jacksonville, for Appelle
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CORRINE PUCCI, FORMER NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO WIFE, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D15-3747 v. GARY JOHNSON, FORMER HUSBAND, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 25, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Elizabeth Senterfitt, Judge. Caleb D. Rowland and William M. Blume, Blume & Rowland, PLLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Beth M. Terry, Jacksonville, for Appellee..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
CORRINE PUCCI, FORMER NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
WIFE, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Appellant,
CASE NO. 1D15-3747
v.
GARY JOHNSON, FORMER
HUSBAND,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed July 25, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Elizabeth Senterfitt, Judge.
Caleb D. Rowland and William M. Blume, Blume & Rowland, PLLC,
Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Beth M. Terry, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The former wife raises two issues in this appeal of the final judgment
dissolving the parties’ marriage. We find no merit in her claim that the trial court
erred in granting the former husband’s motion to enforce the parties’ oral
settlement agreement. However, we agree with the former wife’s argument that
the trial court erred by failing to distribute the marital assets identified in her
motion for rehearing, which were not addressed in the settlement agreement that
was subsequently incorporated into the final judgment. See § 61.075, Fla. Stat.
(requiring the court to value and distribute all marital assets). Accordingly, we
reverse the final judgment and remand this case to the trial court for the limited
purpose of distributing any marital assets not addressed in the settlement
agreement.
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.
LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
2