Filed: Oct. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DENNIS C. STEPHENS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-5418 DOMINOS PIZZA, TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE CO. & AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA OF FLORIDA, INC./SA, Appellees. _/ Opinion filed October 4, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge. Craig O. Stewart of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DENNIS C. STEPHENS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-5418 DOMINOS PIZZA, TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE CO. & AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA OF FLORIDA, INC./SA, Appellees. _/ Opinion filed October 4, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge. Craig O. Stewart of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of F..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
DENNIS C. STEPHENS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-5418
DOMINOS PIZZA,
TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE
CO. & AMTRUST NORTH
AMERICA OF FLORIDA,
INC./SA,
Appellees.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed October 4, 2016.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.
Stephen L. Rosen, Judge.
Craig O. Stewart of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of
Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Rayford H. Taylor of Gilson Athans P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The court having received the September 6, 2016, order of the Supreme Court
of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of March 24, 2016, and remanding the
matter for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192
So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion,
the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED and this case is
REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
2
