NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                       MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                                IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                                OF FLORIDA
                                                SECOND DISTRICT

YOGENDRA S. DHANIK and BHARTI        )
Y. DHANIK,                           )
                                     )
          Appellants,                )
                                     )
v.                                   )                     Case No. 2D13-5292
                                     )
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL              )
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for LUMINENT )
MORTGAGE TRUST 2007-2,               )
                                     )
          Appellee.                  )
                                     )

Opinion filed September 9, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco
County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge.

Michael E. Rodriguez of Foreclosure
Defense Law Firm, P.L., Tampa, for
Appellants.

Dean A. Morande and Michael K. Winston
of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West
Palm Beach, for Appellee.


LaROSE, Judge.


              Yogendra and Bharti Dhanik appeal a final judgment of foreclosure. The

Dhaniks argue, and HSBC Bank USA concedes, that the bank failed to present

sufficient trial evidence of standing at the time it filed the complaint.
               "This court reviews the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to

bring a foreclosure action de novo." Lamb v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 

,

1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

               "A plaintiff alleging standing as a holder must prove it is a holder of the

note and mortgage both as of the time of trial and also that the (original) plaintiff had

standing as of the time the foreclosure complaint was filed." Russell v. Aurora Loan

Servs., LLC, 

, 642 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (quoting Keifert v. Nationstar

Mortg., LLC, 

, 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)). "If the plaintiff is not the payee

of the original note, the plaintiff must also prove that the original note contains an

[e]ndorsement in favor of the plaintiff (special [e]ndorsement) or an [e]ndorsement in

blank." 

standing, the endorsement "must have been made prior to the

filing of the lawsuit." 

bank attached a copy of the mortgage and note to the

complaint, those copies lacked any endorsement to the bank or a blank endorsement.

The note introduced at trial contained a blank endorsement. However, the bank offered

no evidence as to when the blank endorsement was placed on the note. Thus, there

was no evidence before the trial court that the bank had standing at the time the

foreclosure complaint was filed. "The bank's failure to prove a prima facie case

warrants dismissal." May v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 

, 249 (Fla. 2d DCA

2014).

               As in Russell and May, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter

an order of involuntary dismissal based on the bank's lack of standing at the time it filed

the complaint.

               Reversed and remanded with instructions.
                                             -2-
NORTHCUTT and SLEET, JJ., Concur.




                                    -3-